DSpace About DSpace Software
 

DSpace at the University of Texas at Austin School of Information >
School of Information Faculty >
Andrew Dillon >
Publications: Refereed Journal Articles >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2081/1165

Title: Reading from paper versus reading from screens
Authors: Dillon, Andrew
Keywords: Gould, J. D.
Visual Display Units
VDUs
Positive and negative image presentation
Issue Date: 1988
Publisher: Oxford University Press
Citation: This item is not the definitive copy. Please use the following citation when referencing this material: Dillon, A., McKnight, C. and Richardson, J. (1988) Reading from paper versus reading from screens. The Computer Journal, 31(5), 457-464.
Abstract: This paper reviews the literature on reading continuous text from VDUs. The focus is on the reported nature, and potential causes, of reading differences between paper and screens. The first section outlines the scope of the present review. Section 2 discusses the nature of the reported differences between reading from either presentation medium. Five broad differences have been identified suggesting that reading from VDUs is slower, less accurate, more fatiguing, decreases comprehension and is rated inferior by readers. Evidence for the existence of each of these differences is reviewed and conclusions are drawn. In Section 3, ten variables which have been proposed as potential causes of reading differences between paper and screen are reviewed. These include screen dynamics, display polarity, orientation, viewing angle and user characteristics. Recent evidence by Gould et al (1986) is presented which suggests that the image quality of the screen display is the crucial factor and indicates that positive presentation, high resolution and anti-aliasing interactively affect performance by enhancing the quality of the displayed image. The implications of this work for screen presentation of text are presented. Section 4 discusses the relevance of these findings for Project Quartet.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/1165
Appears in Collections:Publications: Refereed Journal Articles

Files in This Item:

File Description SizeFormat
Comp. JouArchival Copy57.5 kBMicrosoft Word 1.x-5.xView/Open
Paper vs screens.htmAccess Copy68.17 kBHTMLView/Open
Paper vs screens.pdfAccess Copy127.46 kBAdobe PDFView/Open

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

 

Valid XHTML 1.0! DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2010  Duraspace - Feedback